Let bots manage their hooks, with the user confirming what widens them
Bots get list_hooks, pause_hook and delete_hook, which act directly since they only take away. A new hook, or a new name, brief or filter, or switching a paused one back on, goes through propose_hook: it stores a hook_proposals row and puts a [hook-proposal:ID] card in the reply, which the user it was proposed to confirms or rejects. The card is read from what Confirm saves, with the bot's reason labelled as its own; confirming checks everything again and saves through the Hooks modal's helpers. A new hook's URL is shown on the card once, to the user only, never in the outcome the bot is told. What calls a hook, its computers and its signing are never proposed. Only chat replies propose, and a hook call's own run gets no hook tools, so a caller's payload can't reach them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -140,8 +140,8 @@ export default async function runBotReply({
|
||||
|
||||
const take_overs: string[] = [];
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* The MCP servers and tools the coordinator proposed: their cards need
|
||||
* the user just like a take-over.
|
||||
* The hooks the bot proposed, and the MCP servers, tools and skills the
|
||||
* coordinator did: their cards need the user just like a take-over.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
const proposals: string[] = [];
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ export default async function runBotTask({
|
||||
is_coordinator: powers.is_coordinator,
|
||||
admin_workspace_ids: powers.admin_workspace_ids,
|
||||
scopes,
|
||||
hooked,
|
||||
})),
|
||||
...admin_tools,
|
||||
...(powers.is_coordinator
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user