Bots get list_hooks, pause_hook and delete_hook, which act directly since
they only take away. A new hook, or a new name, brief or filter, or
switching a paused one back on, goes through propose_hook: it stores a
hook_proposals row and puts a [hook-proposal:ID] card in the reply, which
the user it was proposed to confirms or rejects. The card is read from
what Confirm saves, with the bot's reason labelled as its own; confirming
checks everything again and saves through the Hooks modal's helpers. A
new hook's URL is shown on the card once, to the user only, never in the
outcome the bot is told. What calls a hook, its computers and its signing
are never proposed. Only chat replies propose, and a hook call's own run
gets no hook tools, so a caller's payload can't reach them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
delegate_task takes a task_id to hand over a task already on a list: it
moves to the worker (a workspace's task stays on its list), goes to
doing, and the job is linked back so its end is noted on the task.
hand_over_schedule moves a bot's own routine to another bot, keeping its
workspace. Users get Hand over in the Tasks UI and both routine lists.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
The prompt had grown to a policy document: 13 sections, the same rules
repeated across them, and a state vocabulary no tool accepts. It also
never mentioned the reply/task split, so the model would burn a reply's
8 tool steps on work that belongs in a 50-step task.
- Lead with work placement: answer directly, start_task for its own long
work, delegate_task for a worker, and say work is under way, not done.
- Replace the invented Requested/Queued/Verified list with the real
TaskStatuses and update_task.
- Name the 19 tools it tells the coordinator to use, and which tool
writes which instruction layer, instead of "the available tools".
- Give routines their own section; create_schedule was uncovered.
- Say each safety rule once, and keep the interrupt list short so the
prompt reads as proactive rather than timid.
- Drop the commented-out previous prompt: that is git's job.
The test asserted a heading and a section that no longer exist, so it was
already failing. It now checks the heading, the SiteData name, the
absence of em dashes, the real statuses, and every tool named.
Local, password-only auth:
- No public pages; everything outside /admin and /auth redirects in
- First run (no users) sends every page to /auth/signup, which creates
the super admin (user #1) once and then locks
- Login is email/username + password; removed the emailed-code flow,
/auth/sso and email password reset
- Google login kept for existing accounts only, never creates them
- seed-super-admin now requires SEED_SUPER_ADMIN_PASSWORD
Bots-first admin:
- /admin and closed sections (people, logs, backups) redirect to
/admin/bots; only bots and settings are live (AdminSections)
- Removed the old admin layout; every /admin page uses the bots rail
- Coordinator bot created at signup/seed and by /admin/bots
(ensureCoordinatorBot), which redirects to its chat
- bots.system_prompt (markdown) with a default coordinator prompt
- seed-bots reuses the existing coordinator
Settings:
- Sub pages general (default), profile, change-password, listed in the
rail with a back link; unknown settings paths redirect to general
- Redesigned settings UI: pane header, grouped rows, sticky save bar
- General: System/Light/Dark theme, saved per device
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
tbenandClaude Opus 5.5